It fits and Sam going after high valued targets or saving diplomats or making the choice to go against orders and saving little kids caught in the cross fire can help build a deep narrative in absence of Konami doing any major MGS. Big Boss destabilizing entire regions might be a work of fiction, but The United States doing this is complete objective fact. This concept might work better for what Splinter Cell is more then even MGSV. Grabbing the hostage during the chaos clearly is part of itīut over all, making it to the LZ to be extracted is part of it and adds so much. Sabotaging the communications is part of it Putting C4 on the power generator to take out their power is part of it I love the old Splinter Cell stuff, but it needs more depth, never mind just beating a level, what happens with Sam when runs to get the extraction point? Making it a massive open world allows for even getting to some LZ part of the fun as MGSV did a great job of this, it wasn't JUST about grab a person and mission complete. Give a day and night cycle and have the NPC behave as such and we could literally have the best selling Splinter Cell in history with a whole new generation to carry the legacy. Have areas that are clearly legit kill zones like bases, but also have civilian type areas where he must blend in to kill, capture, save, collect etc. Put Sam in that type of thing with buddies that help him out like dropping him off to some area, add hitman elements like him blending in (or AC as that was a thing in that series too early on). Wildlands is already in that MGSV ball park in terms of concept, open world, AI etc.
I still think Ubisoft can really make Splinter Cell a great series again if not better then what it was prior.here me out folks before killing me lol I like both series, but MGS has a massive edge. Even the worst MGS title imho is better then Splinter Cell.
0 kommentar(er)
